0
0
So, Justice Amy Coney Barret has a book deal, and super tolerant publishing staffers are demanding that deal be taken away because Justice Barret voted to strike down Roe v. Wade and, because that is “tolerance” these days
In an open letter that had received more than 550 signatures as of Friday afternoon, Barrett’s detractors called the deal “a case where a corporation has privately funded the destruction of human rights with obscene profits.”
Of course, under our Constitution, these staffers should read it some time abortion is NOT a federal issue, it is reserved to the States. Again these staffers should read the 10th amendment. Roe v. Wade made that a national right to “privacy”, that decision, I would say, trampled on the States 10th amendment rights. Justice Barret voted to correct that. She voted with the 10th amendment.
Go read the rest, it is a fascinating look at how the left perverts the Constitution. It sounds like your garden variety leftist clap trap, “international law”, and this
“the human rights on which a right to abortion access is predicated are set out in the [United Nations’] Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” a document to which Penguin Random House parent company Bertelsmann commits itself in Section 2.2.1 of its Code of Conduct.
See! The UN says so! That is their argument! And that matters not, because our Constitution is the law of our land, NOT the U.N. Barret’s decision followed our Constitution, not anything the U.N. wrote. Go read their entire argument here
