In November, we had a good laugh when Susanna Gibson lost her race for the Virginia House of Delegates after it was revealed that she had engaged in livestream sex performances as “HotWifeExperience.”
For some unfathomable reason, Politico has decided to give Gibson a platform to try to redeem her political career, setting up the Q-and-A with this rather interesting assertion:
The episode also detonated a debate in Virginia and beyond about digital and sexual privacy in 21st-century politics. In a possible reflection of shifting social norms, Gibson nearly won the race anyway — she lost by less than 1,000 votes and has not ruled out a return to electoral politics in the future.
It “detonated a debate,” did it? Pray tell, what are the opposing sides of this alleged debate about “digital and sexual privacy”? Do the liberal editors at Politico expect us to believe that if a Republican candidate were exposed in similar behavior, they wouldn’t be on the story 24/7? Hell, the liberal media were all-in on the so-called “pee tape” allegations that were part of the “Russian collusion” hoax against Trump, but somehow a real sex scandal involving a Democrat requires a “debate”?
What she does is her business. Consenting adults and all of that. But I am not sure why she deserves sympathy. Frankly, her far left idelogy is far more disturbing than her sex life.
[…] Democrat Won’t Go Away (and She Thinks You’re Stupid) The Pirate’s Cove The Daley Gator A View From The Beach EBL 357 […]